On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
According to Elf the main Chicken hackers (Felix and Kon) do not
read the janitors list and few others do.
I just submitted a ticket for a nasty bug, #433
http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/433
What are your
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:21:40AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
According to Elf the main Chicken hackers (Felix and Kon) do not
read the janitors list and few others do.
I just submitted a ticket for a
You don't actually need to list the documentation files twice in the
arguments to install-extension. It is only necessary to list them in
the `documentation' property. This is just legacy from older versions
of chicken-setup. It would be pretty easy to add an -examples-path
option to
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't actually need to list the documentation files twice in the
arguments to install-extension. It is only necessary to list them in
the `documentation' property. This is just legacy from older versions
of
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using -string on a symbol and calling a destructive string
procedure on the result, you mutate the original symbol everywhere it's
used. After that, the mutated symbol is not eq? to the same symbol
when made
Hi Mario,
How do you propose this is handled? The situation below occurs
because 501 6 (obviously), so chicken-setup thinks that 1.501 is
newer than 1.6.x. My solution would be to remove releases and
prerequisites of the form x.xxx because such a versioning scheme is
idiotic. But I am open
On 15/04/2008, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The versions egg uses the same (sane) principle of version comparison:
(version? (string-version 1.501) (string-version 1.6.0)) = #t
I agree that it is time to sanitize the egg versions, but 501 6 and
there is nothing I can do about
I don't understand what you mean by that. As long as a version is
defined as a dotted list of integers in decimal representation, 1.501
1.6.0. If you want your release versions to be ordered correctly,
then those version numbers have to be a well-ordered sequence in
increasing order and
Hello,
I have changed the symbol-string procedure to copy the string
associated with its argument. There should be a new development
snapshot available tomorrow, or you can check it out from SVN.
-Ivan
Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
According to Elf the main Chicken
Yes, that's exactly what I have been trying to say. If you use the
same consistent versioning format, then chicken-setup will work
correctly, regardless of whether the format is x.x.x or x.xxx, or
whatever. But if you switch from one format to another, then you risk
messing up the version
10 matches
Mail list logo
