Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 felix winkelmann wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: 1) How would I run the tests after installation to a non-trivial DESTDIR? One problem here is to not use any files from a possible other

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Bex wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:38:32AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Shawn Rutledge shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com wrote: Ideally no eggs would be left behind, but maybe that's not realistic. Some other

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: I just added chicken-4.0.0 to the gentoo testing branch. Our stable branch is lagging a bit (3.1.0) unfortunately, mostly because things don't necessarily get moved there unless someone explicitly requests it.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:28:38AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: I have created a man/ subdirectory. In fact, it would be cool, if you could help me and move the old manual into man/3. Sure, I will do this tonight. The wiki is merrily crunching away on my changes right now. I've moved all the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Vincent Manis
On 2009-04-06, at 12:21, Peter Bex wrote: I noticed that the manual section of Getting Started was not tagged, and thus not copied, so I copied tagged it. This means it's also not maintained and may contain outdated info. I did a quick check-up and changed one or two obvious things, but I

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:21:19PM -0700, Vincent Manis wrote: I believe I am the original author of `Getting Started'. I'll take a look at it and see if there's anything (minor, I hope) that should change. Thanks I make a pest of myself on some free software projects for asking if

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Vincent Manis
On 2009-04-06, at 13:28, Peter Bex wrote: there can be a way of generating a one-file version of the user documentation, for all sorts of reasons (e.g., reading it away from You'd have to look into the stream wiki stuff to see how it's done exactly. It's a little too hairy for me too look

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Elf
cause 3.5.3 is the stable 3 branch version? :) -elf On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Shawn Rutledge wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org wrote: I just added chicken-4.0.0 to the gentoo testing branch. Our stable branch is lagging a bit (3.1.0) unfortunately,

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread felix winkelmann
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Vincent Manis vma...@telus.net wrote: On 2009-04-06, at 13:28, Peter Bex wrote: there can be a way of generating a one-file version of the user documentation, for all sorts of reasons (e.g., reading it away from You'd have to look into the stream wiki stuff

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Vincent Manis
On 2009-04-06, at 13:55, felix winkelmann wrote: A simpler way of converting svnwiki syntax to (admittedly ugly) HTML is in the chicken trunk in scripts/wiki2html.scm. It should be easy to hack. That sounds like a good approach, I did actually look at it a long time ago. I'd like nice HTML,

Re: [Chicken-hackers] manual and chicken4 infrastructure

2009-04-06 Thread Ivan Raikov
Hello, As Elf pointed out, the 3.5.0 release was botched because too many untested modifications were made to it. The current development snapshot, 3.5.5 includes bug fixes for some of those issues, although I am not convinced of the stability of srfi-18, and someone reported a segmentation