From: Peter Bex
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix another problem with receiving signals
while read()ing
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 21:56:38 +0100
> Hi all,
>
> Today I noticed an intermittent failure in the scsh-process tests.
> After some debugging, it turned out that my last patch for
> fast
a) when matching "list-of"/"vector-of" with "list"/"vector", each
element of the latter must match the element-type of the former
(reported by megane, fixes #948). Previously the "list"/vector"
type was matched as "(list-of (or ...))" instead, which makes
the match less precise.
b) whe
Peter Bex writes:
> Very clever! I've tested and pushed this.
Cool, thank you very much!
> Are you actually using promises so much that you're running into
> performance issues with them, or was this just for fun?
I ran into memory leaks when trying to implement the lazy-seq egg based
on prom
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> Dear Chickeneers,
>
> the attached patch changes the implementation of promises to be slightly
> more efficient when forcing a promise more than once (one procedure call
> less). Also, instead of keeping the promise result in the p
Quick follow-up: I posted the benchmark results of a different program,
of course, one with the sequence going up to 50 rather than
100. Sorry for the blunder! :-)
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.o
Dear Chickeneers,
the attached patch changes the implementation of promises to be slightly
more efficient when forcing a promise more than once (one procedure call
less). Also, instead of keeping the promise result in the promise
thunk's closure it is now kept in a slot of the promise structure. T
