Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] Testers wanted; iOS patch

2014-03-17 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hi again, Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de writes: I have a new version of this patch on my machine which applies cleanly again (Felix already reviewed it). I'll post it here when I'm back at it! find it attached! Moritz From 4064075061189c7b743b69ebbacad82a089c5c34 Mon Sep 17

Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-fuse

2014-03-17 Thread Jörg F. Wittenberger
Hi Evan, I'm running up against some crazy segfault. It happens under some locally reproducibly circumstances, though I do not yet understand it. Nevertheless, I'm concerned with the inconsistent related use of fuse_file_info_fh's result. As far as I see it's only set in

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix finalizer issue on non-GCable constants

2014-03-17 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, The attached patch fixes the problem from subject, as described here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2014-03/msg00088.html It also cleans up the code a little bit by re-using well-named C functions instead of repeating the same inline and C preprocessor-heavy checks

Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken-fuse

2014-03-17 Thread Jörg F. Wittenberger
Turns out there's some other bug (though in fuse.scm) Am 17.03.2014 15:55, schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger: Hi Evan, I'm running up against some crazy segfault. It happens under some locally reproducibly circumstances, though I do not yet understand it. Nevertheless, I'm concerned with the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix finalizer issue on non-GCable constants

2014-03-17 Thread Kon Lovett
On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, The attached patch fixes the problem from subject, as described here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2014-03/msg00088.html It also cleans up the code a little bit by re-using well-named C

Re: [Chicken-hackers] pop3 support TOP command?

2014-03-17 Thread Alex Shinn
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM, John J Foerch jjfoe...@earthlink.netwrote: Very nice! I see that it has SSL support as well. Would you be at all inclined to making some of hato's modules, like hato-pop, independently available? Yes, the plan is to make all of hato's modules available as

Re: [Chicken-hackers] pop3 support TOP command?

2014-03-17 Thread John J Foerch
Alex Shinn alexsh...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:49 AM, John J Foerch jjfoe...@earthlink.net wrote: Very nice! I see that it has SSL support as well. Would you be at all inclined to making some of hato's modules, like hato-pop, independently available? Yes,