From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [MEGA-PATCH] Modularise the compiler!
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:28:49 +0200
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
If y'all prefer, I could push my branch to call-cc, if that makes it
easier to work
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [MEGA-PATCH] Modularise the compiler!
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 23:28:49 +0200
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:25:00PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
If y'all
Hello!
CR #1142 has been accepted.
A follow-up mail will propose the further steps to be taken.
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hi,
(rename-file x y)
fails on Windows if y already exists. I think it would be better to have the
same behavior as Unix (i.e. overwrite). The attached patch does that.
Regards,
Michele
From 57098c32ce1b02834b972924c85690653b2d4fb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michele La Monaca
Michele La Monaca scripsit:
(rename-file x y)
fails on Windows if y already exists. I think it would be better to have the
same behavior as Unix (i.e. overwrite). The attached patch does that.
+1
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org
The internet is a web
Hello!
I'm not sure how to go on with the CR-related changes.
All eggs that use queues, mmap, binary-search and eviction will break.
This is manageable, as salmonella will point them out to us, but I'd
also like to eggify srfi-18, srfi-69, srfi-1/13/14 and perhaps srfi-4
as well and all that
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
- I don't know how this is handled with henrietta - do we need a
separate CGI script running for this? It seems so, so the
core-branch will need to have different download URLs in
setup.defaults.
Perhaps, I'm not sure
Peter Bex scripsit:
I'd love to hear from some of the people using CHICKEN in their business
or for other Serious Projects (Kristian? Ivan? Andy?) how painful this
would be for them.
I would be pretty damned inconvenienced if the numbers egg were broken for
any substantial period of time,
Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
Shouldn't we check !defined(__CYGWIN__) here?
It can't hurt, but since 2012 Cygwin no longer defines _WIN32.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org
The whole of Gaul is quartered into three halves.
--Julius Caesar
Hi Felix and all,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Felix Winkelmann
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
I'm not sure how to go on with the CR-related changes.
All eggs that use queues, mmap, binary-search and eviction will break.
This is manageable, as salmonella will point them
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00:46AM -0601, Alan Post wrote:
I used Chicken Scheme to bootstrap my company.
That's really cool!
As of a few months ago, I am no longer running any scheme code, it
has been ported to either C or Python.
What is/was the main reason you had to rewrite to Python? C
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:54:48PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00:46AM -0601, Alan Post wrote:
I used Chicken Scheme to bootstrap my company.
That's really cool!
Thank you! It's the most successful Scheme program I've ever
written by a large margin. I was recently
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 04:41:54PM +, Mario domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi Felix and all,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Felix Winkelmann
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
This is just a proposal. What do others think?
Thanks for your message. This is all very exciting
Sadly, it seems that the last attempt at connecting a decent debugger to
Chicken has long since been abandoned:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/3/mayo
I, too, regularly end up hitting a wall with any decent sized application
that also relies on native compilation and interfacing with external
On 08/18/14 20:41, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi Felix and all,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Felix Winkelmann
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
I'm not sure how to go on with the CR-related changes.
I wonder whether it isn't better to postpone releasing these changes,
From: Oleg Kolosov bazur...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:08:23 +0400
On 08/18/14 20:41, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi Felix and all,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Felix Winkelmann
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
All eggs that use queues, mmap, binary-search and eviction will break.
This is manageable, as salmonella will point them out to us, but I'd
also like to eggify srfi-18, srfi-69, srfi-1/13/14 and perhaps srfi-4
as well and all that (including the /really/ massive
I do think it is time for an overhaul, and creating a new major version
branch is the right way to go about it.
Obviously it would take some time to port everything, but it seems that the
changes will be simpler than during the hygienic macros transition.
Ivan
On Aug 19, 2014 12:09 AM, Peter
Hi Felix, Oleg and all,
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 22:43:19 +0200 (CEST) Felix Winkelmann
felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
From: Oleg Kolosov bazur...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR #1142 and upcoming changes
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 23:08:23 +0400
On 08/18/14 20:41, Mario Domenech
Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
I'm not sure reorganizing the core and making it smaller justifies a
major release. I understand some changes caused by the core
reorganization may break code, but I'm looking at major releases from a
user standpoint. What immediate benefit do those changes
John Cowan scripsit:
It's only now with Python 3.4 (arguably 3.3) that parity with Python
2.7 was achieved. There is still no recommendation to convert working
2.7 applications (as opposed to libraries) and there may never be.
Here's a FAQ about the Python 2 to Python 3 transition, one of
I would think that support for Chicken 2 3 should be dropped after a
Chicken 5 branch is made.
If anyone desperately needs Chicken 3, would it not be better to migrate
the Chicken 3 stuff to another server?
I had also implicitly assumed that the modularisation changes would help
bring full R7RS
22 matches
Mail list logo
