Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db

2015-09-06 Thread John Cowan
Moritz Heidkamp scripsit: > The only one I'm a bit unhappy about is `move-memory!' as I couldn't > find a safe inline version of it. Does anyone have a clue whether there > is such a thing already? Presumably that would check lengths only while leaving types to be validated by the scrutinizer? -

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix unsafe specializations in types.db

2015-09-06 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hi everyone, the attached patch addresses the issue explained in https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1216 as well as similar ones I found by sifting through the whole of types.db, though I can't guarantee that any other instances slipped my attention, of course. The only one I'm a bit unhappy about i

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Ensure try-compile cleans up tempfiles (#1213)

2015-09-06 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hi Peter, On 24 August 2015 21:52 CEST, Peter Bex wrote: > I noticed that try-compile leaves a temp.1234.o file in the current > directory when invoked (see #1213). The definition actually has a > "oname" variable, but it isn't used. So the attached patch causes it > to explicitly pass "-o ONA