On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:03:20PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > That doesn't change the fact that it is very bad programming style. It
> > > doesn't
> > > scale, is not portable and very inefficient. Endorsing such a programming
> > > style
> > > encourages writing bad code,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:33:59PM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote:
> Hi dear chickeners!
>
> We have a really nice macro[1] that runs "git describe --tags" and produces
> string-output of our current version at compile-time. This method is (when
> not cross-compiling) very robust because it
Peter Bex scripsit:
> As far as I know, R5RS doesn't say anything about a maximum number of
> procedure arguments in direct calls or when using apply. In my book,
> it's "better" in some absolute way to remove any limitations beyond
> those which R5RS allows for.
The general permission to
