;-)
as promised:
Am 02.12.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> No more patches today. This again is no good
> because it allocates a slot in pending_interrupts, but doesn't - and
> can't deallocate it.
No more patches yesterday. This one sustained the test to sleep one
night over it.
Am 03.12.2015 um 14:01 schrieb John Cowan:
> Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
>
>> One more question. I would have expected chicken to store signals
>> received while C_interrupts_enabled==0 and deliver them at some point
>> after C_interrupts_enabled becomes true. Why are those signals ignored?
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
> One more question. I would have expected chicken to store signals
> received while C_interrupts_enabled==0 and deliver them at some point
> after C_interrupts_enabled becomes true. Why are those signals ignored?
That's what signal blocking is supposed to be
