On 2016-02-24 21:12, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:54:24PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> > > > As I wrote in this other mail before I received this one: how about
> > > > removing the
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:54:24PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> > > As I wrote in this other mail before I received this one: how about
> > > removing the identifier from the hide list. This should not be
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:04:40PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Without this, the sanity check that requires a prefix to be given when
> the "-deploy" option is used is never triggered, and running the command
> "chicken-install -deploy -repository" just prints "#f".
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
Peter
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:50:31PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Not sure if I understand what you mean, but listing eggs does work:
>
> $ wget 'http://code.call-cc.org/cgi-bin/henrietta.cgi?release=5=1' -q
> -O -
>
> queues
> object-evict
> srfi-18
> binary-search
>
Hello,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:36:17 +0100 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:05:00PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
>
>> I might be interested in the setup stuff, but it will take time, of course
>> (it's quite some work to get this working on Windows
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 01:05:00PM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> But backporting can be done afterwards, and even just if requested.
> Development on 4 should be phased out, IMHO, excepting critical
> security issues, of course.
Usually it's very little (or no) work to backport. If
> > Does it have to be fixed in Chicken 4 at all?
>
> Not necessarily, but I figured that since the scheduler hasn't changed
> much between the two versions, if we have a fix for 5 it can be applied
> to master without too many changes as well. This goes for several
> improvements that have been
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> > Am 24.02.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Peter Bex:
> > > I really hope you understand this and can agree with it.
> >
> > As I wrote in this other mail before I received this one: how about
> > removing the identifier from the
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Peter Bex:
> > I really hope you understand this and can agree with it.
>
> As I wrote in this other mail before I received this one: how about
> removing the identifier from the hide list.
Am 24.02.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Peter Bex:
> I really hope you understand this and can agree with it.
As I wrote in this other mail before I received this one: how about
removing the identifier from the hide list. This should not be able to
break anything and allow me to get rid of the overhead.
Am 24.02.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
>> Am 24.02.2016 um 09:29 schrieb felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com:
I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
scheduler, see
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:21:19AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> > Am 24.02.2016 um 09:29 schrieb felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com:
> >>> I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
> >>> scheduler, see
> >>>
Am 24.02.2016 um 09:29 schrieb felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com:
>> I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
>> scheduler, see
>> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=d9e4c5b8f8473fd1114dcec56c9c8a079b252362
>> However, none of these behaved any different under CHICKEN
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:29:56AM +0100, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > I've done some tests and I was able to get strange behaviour from the
> > scheduler, see
> > http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=d9e4c5b8f8473fd1114dcec56c9c8a079b252362
> > However, none of these behaved any different
14 matches
Mail list logo