Re: [Chicken-hackers] strange csc-warning (Version 4.13.0)

2018-06-30 Thread Martin Schneeweis
Hi John, thank you very much for this detailed answer! John Cowan wrote: > I've reformatted your code to Lisp standard style (2 spaces instead of > tabs, no parens on their own lines) for better readability. Thank you for that input - I am relatively new to Scheme/Lisp and therefore my idea of

Re: [Chicken-hackers] strange csc-warning (Version 4.13.0)

2018-06-30 Thread John Cowan
I've reformatted your code to Lisp standard style (2 spaces instead of tabs, no parens on their own lines) for better readability. (define strange-warning (lambda (sym options) (let ((el (assq sym options))) (if (pair? el) (if (list? el) "list" (cdr el)) ; <== strange

[Chicken-hackers] ☪PATCH☪ Check exitlevel in windows build scripts

2018-06-30 Thread felix . winkelmann
This was reported by Peter: egg build scripts on Windows did not abort on error, as the exitlevel of each command has to be checked explicitly. felix From 29b7d964852c9701d559b351080874dfdd397f2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: felix Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 11:53:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Check

[Chicken-hackers] strange csc-warning (Version 4.13.0) - the file...

2018-06-30 Thread Martin Schneeweis
sorry... (import scheme chicken) (define strange-warning (lambda (sym options) (let ((el (assq sym options))) (if (pair? el) (if (list? el) "list" (cdr el) ; <== strange warning here ) "found nothing" ) ) )) (define no-warning (lambda (sym options) (let ((el (assq sym

[Chicken-hackers] strange csc-warning (Version 4.13.0)

2018-06-30 Thread Martin Schneeweis
Hi, the attached file contains 3 procedures a) strange-warning b) no-warning c) also-no-warning (a) and (b) should be semantically identical - just the if's are rearranged. "csc strange-warning.scm" produces a type-warning for (a) but not for (b): ...call to `cdr', expected argument