Re: [Chicken-hackers] Some questions about CHICKEN 5 eggs and modules

2018-08-31 Thread Ivan Raikov
Thanks for making a patch for this issue! -Ivan On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 4:14 AM wrote: > > > > So the basic problem is to install multiple sets of files, in separate > > > steps? I think for "scheme-include" components this should be possible, > > > but (as far as I can see) this is not

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ☞PATCH☜ Allow (foo ... ) syntax for "modules" egg property

2018-08-31 Thread felix . winkelmann
> There is some canonicalisation that happens to module names in other > places (e.g. converting (srfi 1) -> srfi-1), so I think this needs to > use the existing routine for that. How about the attached patch? Much better. Pushed. felix ___

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ☞PATCH☜ Allow (foo ...) syntax for "modules" egg property

2018-08-31 Thread Evan Hanson
There is some canonicalisation that happens to module names in other places (e.g. converting (srfi 1) -> srfi-1), so I think this needs to use the existing routine for that. How about the attached patch? Evan >From 8dbc6a7b17bfceb8d8058a9868c8b7c9e93f27b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Evan

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ☀PATCH☀ Handle directories transparently in chicken-install

2018-08-31 Thread Evan Hanson
On 2018-08-30 9:29, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > This patch addresses the requests from Thomas and Ivan to support > directories transparently in include and data components for eggs. Applied. Evan ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list