Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db

Peter Bex writes: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:06:15PM +0300, megane wrote: >> Hi folks! >> >> Do you think that adding specializations for multiple argument calls to >> mathematical functions is worth it? Like this: > > We have a rewrite for this already, I wonder why it's not being applied.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:06:15PM +0300, megane wrote: > Hi folks! > > Do you think that adding specializations for multiple argument calls to > mathematical functions is worth it? Like this: We have a rewrite for this already, I wonder why it's not being applied. That's (rewrite 'scheme#+ 19)

[Chicken-hackers] Handling multiple args in types.db

Hi folks! Do you think that adding specializations for multiple argument calls to mathematical functions is worth it? Like this: diff --git a/types.db b/types.db index b5bc766..e91c482 100644 --- a/types.db +++ b/types.db @@ -316,7 +316,10 @@ ((integer integer) (integer)