Hi all,
Pretty straightforward patch. I decided to get rid of the mutation
of pkw and use it in "loop" because I found it a bit confusing to
have skw in the loop and pkw as a mutable lexical var, so sorry
for the large patch. It doesn't really change all that much.
Other than moving pkw into
On Sat, Jun 29, 2019 at 03:26:54PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a patch for #1627.
>
> I'm not happy with the hacky way the reader deals with these, but I could
> not really come up with a clean solution for it. Suggestions for
> improvement are welcome.
There was a small
Hi all,
Attached is a patch for #1627.
I'm not happy with the hacky way the reader deals with these, but I could
not really come up with a clean solution for it. Suggestions for
improvement are welcome.
Cheers,
Peter
From 5f0eaad134f42e70ad1bef7f50f13342a12a7441 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 08:43:00PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2019-06-27 7:31, megane wrote:
> > Good catch! Didn't intend to change other logic.
> >
> > Fixed version attached.
>
> Thanks, here's a sign-off. I put the variable-mark check back to the way
> it was, to minimise the diff, and
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:54:51PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> This patch addresses the problem reported by Sven Hartrumpf
> (#1624).
Thanks for the quick patch! I've pushed it.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:17:26PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> The interpreter's "report" command (,r) was a casualty of db2608b1f,
> which causes `symbol->string' to fail when passed a keyword.
Thanks, pushed!
> Update that code to use `keyword->string' and add a guard procedure to
> the
