On 2019-06-29 12:06, Peter Bex wrote:
> We could extend this check to ensure it's one of the three recognised
> styles, but maybe that's overkill?
It looks like if you put any other keyword in there it falls back to the
portable style, so I personally think it's OK to leave it alone.
Cheers,
> Hello Felix,
> I'm contacting you about Chicken 5.1.0 and armel architecture.
>
> Some days ago I uploaded the amd64 package to Debian unstable,
> so our porting teams could recompile it on every architecture that
> Debian supports; unfortunately the build process didn't go well
> everywhere,
Hi there,
On 2019-05-29 11:39, ko...@upyum.com wrote:
> felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > > On 2019-05-07 7:45, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > > > On 2019-05-06 13:04, ko...@upyum.com wrote:
> > > > > I don't think that patch is right. If you emit import libraries from
> > > > > the
> > > > >
