Hi Peter,
On 2019-09-14 15:28, Peter Bex wrote:
> I made a few small tweaks to the patch, see attachment. The types.db
> entry was syntactically invalid so I fixed that, and I've added checks
> that the argument to set-record-printer! is a symbol (the original
> macro contains that check as
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 08:04:31AM +0300, megane wrote:
> megane writes:
> > Also signal an error if trying to re-enter. This also would cause an
> > infinite loop (when calling (gc #t) inside a finalizer). It would
> > need special handling if re-entry is to be supported.
>
> This is too
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:16:01PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Sure, here's a patch that adds a procedural interface as proposed above.
> This is also the approach Guile uses, although theirs is called
> `set-record-type-printer!`. Let me know what you think.
I really like that what was a macro
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:33:50PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> See #1346.
Thanks, pushed. I'll keep the ticket open for define-constant and
define-type. I'm not sure about the latter though, because types should
be in a different namespace than identifiers (you can have a type x
