> >Left as an exercise to you, dear reader. A singly-linked list is
> >simple and straightforward, I find hash-tables ugly and wasteful
> >and will wory about scalability when the time arrives.
>
> IMHO single linked lists do have one drawback: they encode the assumption
> of a specific from of
>
> So, I'd suggest the attached patch instead. I've also updated NEWS
> to mention the other types we check and remove the comment that the
> fix is partial.
Right, please just apply your patch, if you are ok with my changes. I agree
about the types.
felix
On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:11:31PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> This patch extends 21ff0d6affb35f7184a5e78f9d4beccc869b47b2 to
> type-names, inline procedures and constants, giving a warning when
> an identifier naming such an entity is exported.
I think the types should be
On Oct 1 2019, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
I don't think the -unroll-limit is that useful option to expose for the
user. The -inline-limit already controls the amount of inlining. I
couldn't get anything to unroll more than once without having to
increase the inline-limit, which of
