Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1620 by ignoring captured state of replaced variables

> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:51:28AM +0300, megane wrote: > > > > Here's a new patch that drops the (not captured) check. > > > > > > Thanks for making that! Now that my

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1633 by detecting nonexistent field names (typos) in constructor argument list in define-record-type

Hi all, Here's a relatively straightforward patch for #1633; we simply walk the constructor's arguments and check that there's a matching field definition for it. If not, bail out with syntax-error. Cheers, Peter From 7606cb342a09abb3f0c5798136811f65e736339b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix #1620 by ignoring captured state of replaced variables

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 04:34:02PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:51:28AM +0300, megane wrote: > > > Here's a new patch that drops the (not captured) check. > > > > Thanks for making that! Now that my original pa

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] check for exported types, constants, inline procedures (#1346)

On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:45:42PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > Right, please just apply your patch, if you are ok with my changes. I agree > about the types. Done! Thanks for pushing forward on this. Cheers, Peter signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___