Hello everyone, On 2020-05-09 8:42, Evan Hanson wrote: > On 2020-05-07 16:43, Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > > Which of the following options would you prefer? > > > > 1. Patching scsh-process to pass the correct file mask when using > > `file-open`. > > 2. Patching posixunix.scm to calculate a better default. > > Option 2 seems preferable to me; it should at least match `open-output-file' > if not the umask, but either change will be backwards-incompatible so anything > we do will probably nee a CR.
I have created a change request and patch for this here: https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1698 I think the change itself is simple enough, but it may break code that is relying on the fact that file-open creates an executable file by default, hence the CR. All the best, Evan
