Hi,
the vertical spacing was a bit off in the previous patch, here's a fixed
one.
>From 97733d03230891d14facef5487b75d28ebac35ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: megane
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 17:04:52 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Report more information for unresolved identifiers in modules
The new
Peter Bex writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
> improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
> recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
> face.
>
Thanks, pushed.
Hi all,
Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
face.
I think having these redundant predicate checks in the expander was
a temporary measure
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:07:53AM +0300, megane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a small patch to make the compiler maintain more fine grained line number
> info.
Thanks, pushed with a small change:
I lifted the let* of "cur" up into the and-let* above, because "cur" is
always truthy anyway, and it makes no
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:44:18 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:46:06 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>
>> We've set up a "State of CHICKEN 2021" survey at
>> http://surveys.call-cc.org/state-of-chicken/2021/
>>
>> It would be great to have your inputs and
Hi,
here's a POC tool I've been using for a year. It prints the types known to
scrutinizer in the current scope.
I repeat, this is NOT a patch supposed to be added to core as is.
Some issues:
- It uses a dirty hack: prints the info whenever '(##core#type-hole ...)
is seen.
- The usage
Hi,
a small patch to make the compiler maintain more fine grained line number
info.
>From 98f76b162d7c4984092f5db42cad2648d992ceea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: megane
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 07:46:01 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Make ir-macro-transformer retain more of line-number
information
