issues.
I take your point that the string-copy would not be affected, though, thank you.
-elf
On 27 November 2023 15:41:59 GMT+02:00, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
>> Question: if there is no translation at all, won't the invalid chars cause
>> issues with things like string-lengt
Question: if there is no translation at all, won't the invalid chars cause
issues with things like string-length and string-copy procs? That is, since the
number of octets can't be correctly translated to a number of glyphs, there
will be some unpleasant side effects.
-elf
On 27 November 2023
It certainly shouldn't be *, nor should it be an error... technically an empty
union should be a null set, which would correspond to either a non-extant type
or to no return/value at all...
-elf
On 26 September 2023 12:02:56 GMT+03:00, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>the attac
- and that's assuming we only
want support for 64-bit win10/server 2018 and later.
-elf
On 5 September 2021 15:12:49 GMT+03:00, Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
>Hi Peter,
>
>On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:26:00 +0200 Peter Bex wrote:
>
>> As Vasilij already reported, there are two failing
I do use Windows regularly and am looking to improve chicken support for it.
-elf
On 30 August 2021 19:55:03 GMT+03:00, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
>> > * As far as I can tell, none of the CHICKEN developers use Windows
>> > regularly.
>>
>> True. I
How does one access the libera.chat network? What is the servername etc?
-elf
On 26 May 2021 14:26:07 GMT+03:00, Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The CHICKEN Team has decided to move the #chicken IRC channel to the
>Libera.Chat network.
>
>Our main IRC repres
Ah, got it. My apologies. (Only starting to look at the module code now.)
-elf
On April 7, 2019 7:57:37 AM UTC, Peter Bex wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 04:05:53AM +0000, elf wrote:
>> Question: does it handle circular imports? Is
>> module a -> import b
>> module b
Question: does it handle circular imports? Is
module a -> import b
module b -> import a
an error? Should it be?
-elf
On April 7, 2019 3:46:36 AM UTC, Evan Hanson wrote:
>On 2019-04-05 16:18, Peter Bex wrote:
>> Here's a pretty straightforward patch to prevent a module from
>
We can optimise it by adding the chicken- and , at the same time... or we can
add the 'and' via a double reverse... any ideas for nicer optimisation?
-elr
On 27 December 2018 2:31:03 GMT+02:00, elf wrote:
>Shouldn't that be
>(string-join
> (map
>(cute string-append &quo
Shouldn't that be
(string-join
(map
(cute string-append "CHICKEN-" <> "s")
'("user" "hacker" "janitor" "meister" "lover" "hater"))
",")
Though that doesn't handle the and. :)
-elf
(length a) (length b)) #f ...)
That said, I can understand the point of a string comparator that only
tests up to the length of the shortest argument, but I submit that it
shouldn't be named substring, which has different normal semantics. :)
Thoughts, ideas, changes, flames?
-elf
__
Sorry, I sent a response and it didn't go to the list. Testing to make
sure that I can indeed send to the list.
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
not all flonums are rational.
chicken is perfectly compliant with r5 here: r5 does not require the entire
numeric tower.
-elf
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The manual claims that numerator and denominator are not implemented,
but of course, they are, just in a way
chicken doesn't have rationals.
-elf
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 01:45 -0700, Elf wrote:
not all flonums are rational.
chicken is perfectly compliant with r5 here: r5 does not require the entire
numeric tower.
This is a common source of confusion
rational? always returns true for all numbers.
-elf
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:17 -0700, Elf wrote:
chicken doesn't have rationals.
(rational? 2/3) = #t
(rational? 37287.2983) = #t
Perhaps you are thinking of this, which means something
In a word, yes.
In multiple words, R6 is an abomination before the Lord.
R7 is in the works and will probably be supported provided the mistakes of
R6 are not repeated, which they won't be.
-elf
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
So the extraordinary compiler Stalin is sliding
Out of curiousity, what good reasons are there for using R6, since you seem
to be so behind doing so?
-elf
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I'm sorry; those are reasons not to approve r6rs. There are many
things, it seems to me, which don't belong in the standard, but which
mail from me is apparently not going through. this is just a test message.
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
, and that is why R6 is not, nor will ever be,
an option for chicken. R6 is not a set of language features; its a philosophy
of how Scheme should be, and we cannot agree with that.
-elf
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
It's like I didn't even say. Oh, I did.
Stalin decided that r5rs
i'd be all for dropping msvc (at least temporarily) while more important things
are fixed/improved.
-elf
On Fri, 29 May 2009, felix winkelmann wrote:
[this message didn't make it to the list for some reason, so I send it again,
if you got this already, please ignore my blathering]
Hi!
I
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, felix winkelmann wrote:
snip
Don't use parallel builds.
heh, this made my morning. thanks :)
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
cause 3.5.3 is the stable 3 branch version? :)
-elf
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
I just added chicken-4.0.0 to the gentoo testing branch. Our stable branch is
lagging a bit (3.1.0) unfortunately
perhaps it would be a better idea to wait on any infrastructure decisions until
4.0.0 is actually out the door and well-supported by eggs, etc? it seems
premature to be worrying about such things when a release is on the immediate
horizon.
-elf
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
From: Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] benchmarks
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
also, does anyone have an objection to me giving a talk on chicken to the local
lisp users group?
Depends on the contents of the talk
i did? i didnt
-elf
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
You remembered to update NEWS, also. Good developer! :-)
-Ivan
Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
patch applied! thanks!
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken
unless anyone objects, i will send the fannkuch benchmark to the shootout in
24 hours.
also, does anyone have an objection to me giving a talk on chicken to the local
lisp users group?
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers
theres a (hidden) tag you should put in the meta files if its not ready
for release.
-elf
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
High Priority: NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY
IMO you are overreacting...
cgi-util
read the bloody doc, and the forthcoming
'corrections made and corrections needed' doc.
-elf
who, after a week of migraine and trying to go through all the eggs to find
the correct licence terms, is starting to get a bit frustrated
___
Chicken-hackers
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, felix winkelmann wrote:
Elf wrote this on chicken-janitors:
idea/suggestion regarding bootstrapping and bootstrap.tar.gz :
1) get rid of bootstrap.tar.gz . make a directory, bootstrap, with the c
files in it, that doesnt get used by default. also makes object
shouldnt it be installed to INSTALL_SHARE_HOME ?
which is settable at compile time, iirc, and saved in the chicken-config.h
file...
-elf
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Yes, several other eggs do that, including one of
mine. chicken-setup exports a variable installation-prefix
YES
theres already a variable set in the chicken-config.h global include file
for this sort of thign, specifically, that SHOULD have been passed in at
runtime.
-elf
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Ivan Raikov wrote:
In that case, I believe all that needs to be done is to modify
copy-file and move
,
and is easily maintainable.
for cross compilation issues, simply have BOOTSTRAP_blah settings as well
as regular settings, when applicable.
-elf
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Actually, I'm planning
. but thats irrelevant.) however,
the one thing i can say for it is that its there, on every box ive been on,
at least for the last 10 years. whereas ive only seen or used a bsd make on
openbsd.
-elf
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex
gnu's make is so popular.
-elf
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:51:23AM -0800, Elf wrote:
at a guess, i imagine that the reason for felix (and chicken) using gnu make
is that a) its available for all platforms supported by chicken and b) its
common on all
to be 100% compat with each other. explain to me why this would be a
win?
-elf
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 09:51:23AM -0800, Elf wrote:
at a guess, i imagine that the reason for felix (and chicken) using gnu make
is that a) its available for all
for time
checking are fairly heinous...
-elf
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
First of all, I know that the Autotools approach has been
criticized for quite a long time. Surely, I can understand the
people having a hard feeling with all the bunches
and number handling improvements would be orders of magnitude
more useful :)
What kind of improvements would you suggest?
working that out currently. i dont want to start making suggestions or
'complaints' without being able to back it up with code or pseudocode. :)
-elf
of unpredictable
and undebuggable SIGSEGVs. may i ask the intended purpose of mprotecting
regular memory?
-elf
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
Hi!
A question to the unix hackers:
Is it legal to call mprotect() on memory allocated via malloc()? (yes, properly
aligned to page boundaries
primarily
and the lack of makeinfo. also the -p flag to mkdir is not happy.
building is fine but installation fails :(
-elf
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 10/30/07, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, the Makefile.cygwin is missing from the release branch.
Indeed, thanks
aziz requested that this be posted to all the indivdual implementation lists.
so im doing so. despite my own feelings about where r6rs can and should go.
-elf
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:18:48 -0400
From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:11:03 -0400
From: Marc Feeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
At the Scheme workshop a few weeks ago there was a panel
discussion on the R6RS (Discussion
what platforms and do we have testsuites available? i'm willing to help write
a testsuite to make this job feasible.
-elf
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 9/2/07, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to agree that no official releases is a Bad Thing, unless it's a
temporary
I tend to agree that no official releases is a Bad Thing, unless it's a
temporary change.
-elf
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:28:37PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
The chicken version has been bumped to 2.701, now. There will be
no more official releases
i would not consider that an endorsement at all. mozilla's code is abysmal.
i still use lynx.
on a more serious note though, what are you requiring for a build system?
and where is it failing?
-elf
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 8/14/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL
44 matches
Mail list logo
