Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-12 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 12, 2008 12:25 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. If you believe the load on the CGI will be reasonably low, then keep using it for now. Our university has fat pipes, it's just that they might not appreciate a DDOS. ;-) If I understand you correctly, you have a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-12 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 12, 2008 7:43 AM, Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/02/2008, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 11, 2008 8:48 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera Depending on what the big boss says, I might ask you to provide the eggs with the .tgz extension in your webapp

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ANN: new features in release 3

2008-02-11 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 11, 2008 4:01 PM, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: New left-section right-section (sort of a variadic curry). Very cool. I, for one, bow to our new higher-order overlords. Thanks, Graham ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-11 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 11, 2008 6:33 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Graham, Mario, anyone else... just a quick (i hope) question. Do you know of a way to make chicken-setup install an egg that's been compiled previously? Sure, if the egg has been extracted, you can 'cd' into the egg

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-11 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 11, 2008 8:48 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, progress report. I've got a few eggs building and installing, so that's good. Depending on what the big boss says, I might ask you to provide the eggs with the .tgz extension in your webapp so I don't have to

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-07 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Feb 7, 2008 9:03 AM, Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, in order to do this /properly/, we need the egg filenames to include version information. I won't go into the details, but i'll just say that without that, we'd have to use our existing mechanisms for live

Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy

2007-09-02 Thread Graham Fawcett
On 9/2/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So who is going to step in and volunteer to perform, or procure, enough cross-platform testing to be worthy of the name release manager? I don't have the time for that, but I do have access to Solaris/SPARC systems, and would help to set up a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] compiler docs

2007-06-04 Thread Graham Fawcett
On 6/2/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I proudly present a first draft of the beginnings of my meagre attempt to provide an inadequate and ridiculuous joke of something remotely similar to a description of the compilation process and internal structure of the compiler: