On 2017-01-20 16:28, Kooda wrote:
> Looks fine, pushed!
Thanks Kooda!
> I’m curious though: how did you catch this?
http://cppcheck.sourceforge.net/
Evan
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/lis
On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:16:20 +1300
Evan Hanson wrote:
> Previously, the call to va_end() would be skipped when this procedure
> was given invalid arguments (and continued to `barf` a result).
> ---
> runtime.c | 6 --
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/runtim
Previously, the call to va_end() would be skipped when this procedure
was given invalid arguments (and continued to `barf` a result).
---
runtime.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/runtime.c b/runtime.c
index 78f2f9b6..40fd368f 100644
--- a/runtime.c
+++ b/