Hi,
nice that you like the idea. However the use case I had in mind works
only so much.
(: replaced (deprecated replyced-with))
is fine.
(: dangerous (deprecated http://cwcc.org/ticket/0815))
works at least. Though for no good reason I'd have the tendency to
write the URL as a string.
On 2014-05-19 8:58, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Though for no good reason I'd have the tendency to
write the URL as a string. After all it might contain characters,
which make them not readable as Symbols. But that's rejected by
chicken. So:
(: dangerous (deprecated
On 2014-05-13 9:22, John Cowan wrote:
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
use of deprecated `~a' - consider `~a'
Reads fine to me.
Same -- good idea, Jörg. Here's a patch for that.
Evan
From cf24d45002a334a145cdf58bf748df3087121a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evan Hanson
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:32:44AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
On 2014-05-13 9:22, John Cowan wrote:
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
use of deprecated `~a' - consider `~a'
Reads fine to me.
Same -- good idea, Jörg. Here's a patch for that.
Thanks for sending this patch, I had
Am 12.05.2014 21:09, schrieb Evan Hanson:
On 2014-05-12 20:54, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42:26AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
This is instead of library procedures, since deprecated identifiers
need not be procedures.
But I don't see syntax identifiers as having a value in the
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
use of deprecated `~a' - consider `~a'
It might come along a bit terse for the normal case - as so many
compiler warnings, though.
Reads fine to me.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org
Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've
On 2014-05-12 20:54, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42:26AM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
This is instead of library procedures, since deprecated identifiers
need not be procedures.
But I don't see syntax identifiers as having a value in the traditional
sense. How about detected
