Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move around {rename, delete}-file and a question about module for inexact

Hi Peter, On 2017-09-10 17:33, Peter Bex wrote: Here's a straightforward patch to move those two procedures from library.scm to file.scm. Applied, thanks. Evan ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move around {rename, delete}-file and a question about module for inexact

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Bex wrote: This same inconsistency crops up in (scheme lazy), which has > delay, delay-force, force, promise? and make-promise, whereas > the scheme module has delay and force. > As the main inventor of the R7RS-small modules, I

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move around {rename, delete}-file and a question about module for inexact

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 05:33:16PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > Given that we're trying to put r7rs-like procedures under similar > namespace (but with scheme replaced by chicken) that creates a small > inconsistency; (chicken base) would hold finite?, infinite? and nan? > but they're really in

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Move around {rename, delete}-file and a question about module for inexact

Hi all, Here's a straightforward patch to move those two procedures from library.scm to file.scm. I tried to move {file,directory}-exists? as well, but it seems there are a few places which use it, and that would mean eval will depend on file, irregex and posix, which I think is a bit too heavy