On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:53:57PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> I think the patch is good, I'll apply it soon.
Done.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:01:05PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> On 2016-03-05 14:16, Peter Bex wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:03:14PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > > - sprintf(rw_buffer, " %lu", (unsigned long)((char
> > > *)C_data_pointer(x))[ n ]);
> > > +
On 2016-03-05 14:16, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:03:14PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> > - sprintf(rw_buffer, " %lu", (unsigned long)((char
> > *)C_data_pointer(x))[ n ]);
> > + sprintf(rw_buffer, " %u", ((unsigned char *)C_data_pointer(x))[
> > n ]);
>
>
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Does this mean an unsigned char argument to a varags function is always
> widened to "int"? How else can it know how much to take off the stack?
Yes, it does. This pattern is called "the integer promotions" in the C
standards: _Bool, short, char, bitfield, and enum types
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:03:14PM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> This allows the client to consider the stream as a written u8vector,
> without needing to mask off the extra bits of any elements outside the
> byte range.
> ---
> dbg-stub.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
This allows the client to consider the stream as a written u8vector,
without needing to mask off the extra bits of any elements outside the
byte range.
---
dbg-stub.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dbg-stub.c b/dbg-stub.c
index 96227de..bbfa3c5 100644
---
