On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:02:42PM -0700, Evan Hanson wrote:
This patch improves cond's behavior on clauses which contain `=` but do
not match the precise definition of cond.
Excellent patch, thanks! I signed it off as-is.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
From
This patch improves cond's behavior on clauses which contain `=` but do
not match the precise definition of cond.
CHICKEN's current behavior is as follows:
#; (cond (#t =))
Error: (caddr) during expansion of (cond ...) - bad argument type: ()
...
I believe this behavior is
