> On 2017-03-02 10:36, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > I can't recall whether we have settled on this, but having a "file"
> > and a "files" module strikes me and somewhat confusing.
>
> Right, it's my intention that we drop "files" once it (and posix) have
> been refactored into "file"
On 2017-03-02 10:36, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> I can't recall whether we have settled on this, but having a "file"
> and a "files" module strikes me and somewhat confusing.
Right, it's my intention that we drop "files" once it (and posix) have
been refactored into "file" and other
I can't recall whether we have settled on this, but having a "file" and a
"files"
module strikes me and somewhat confusing.
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
This is a placeholder for what will eventually be the (chicken file)
module. For now, it simply reexports values from the preexisting "files"
and "posix" units.
---
README| 1 +
chicken-install.scm | 1 +
defaults.make | 2 +-
distribution/manifest | 4 +++
eval.scm
