Good find, thanks megane.
Here's a signoff. I refactored it a bit to avoid the `begin' and `set!'
inside the cond clause.
Could someone have a look at this, please, as well as the signoff for
megane's other patch from 30/3 (re: typematch-tests.scm)?
Thanks,
Evan
>From 45499d633b15103d658c2fc319
One more time.
megane writes:
> Hi!
> I wonder what happened. Maybe now?
>
> felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com writes:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here's a small fix.
>>>
>>
>> Hi! Somehow the patch doesn't seemed to be attached. Can you send it
>> again?
>>
>>
>> felix
diff --git a/scrutinizer.scm b/scruti
> Hi,
>
> Here's a small fix.
>
Hi! Somehow the patch doesn't seemed to be attached. Can you send it
again?
felix
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
Hi,
Here's a small fix.
Consider this example:
(compiler-typecase (list 2 'a)
((forall (x) (list x x)) 1)
(else #t))
Trying to compile this causes an error in the compiler:
Error: (cdr) bad argument type: #f
In this typecase the first case fails (cannot match/unify 2 and 'a). The
failed m
