thank you for checking. i’ll look into it.
i use a lot of ‘ln -s’ to “mount" C4 vs C5. ex:
ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/chicken" /usr/local/share/chicken
ln -shf "${CHICKEN_PREFIX}/share/manual-labor-support"
/usr/local/share/manual-labor-support
ln -shf
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:40:11PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Kon,
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce this with a small test case or by using
> the includes branch of fx-utils in SVN. What does `echo ,r | csi` say
> for this CHICKEN installation?
I've also tried and failed to reproduce it.
> On Sep 20, 2018, at 2:40 AM, Evan Hanson wrote:
>
> Hi Kon,
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce this with a small test case or by using
> the includes branch of fx-utils in SVN. What does `echo ,r | csi` say
> for this CHICKEN installation?
CHICKEN
(c) 2008-2018, The CHICKEN Team
(c)
Hi Kon,
I haven't been able to reproduce this with a small test case or by using
the includes branch of fx-utils in SVN. What does `echo ,r | csi` say
for this CHICKEN installation?
Evan
On 2018-09-17 17:15, Kon Lovett wrote:
> (install prefix for C5 is /usr/local/chicken/5)
>
> the
-possibly useful information; hidden as a .egg comment
(extension fx-utils
#;(inline-file)
(types-file)
;FIXME Error: (apply) bad argument type: #f
#;(component-dependencies fx-inlines)
(csc-options "-O3" "-d1" "-local" "-no-procedure-checks") )
> On Sep 17, 2018, at 5:15
(install prefix for C5 is /usr/local/chicken/5)
the scheme-include install in /usr/local/chicken/5/5/share seems out-of-step w/
the binaries in /usr/local/chicken/5/lib, w/ the addition of an extra level ‘5’
not sure what i am doing wrong, if anything
—
