Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-25 Thread felix . winkelmann
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 04:58:06PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > > Well, here's a bunch of patches to fix this issue (#1221) as well as a > > handful of memory-related issues. I still haven't managed to pinpoint > > the crashes we're seeing on Salmonella, but this is a separate issue > > which

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-25 Thread Evan Hanson
On 2015-10-24 21:19, Peter Bex wrote: > Please, apply the other patches (which this mail is a reply to) first, > as I think they're pretty important as well. Then apply the attached > patch. It applies to both master and chicken-5. I've applied the first group. They make sense; good work and

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 04:58:06PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > Well, here's a bunch of patches to fix this issue (#1221) as well as a > handful of memory-related issues. I still haven't managed to pinpoint > the crashes we're seeing on Salmonella, but this is a separate issue > which seems to be

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-17 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:43:59AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:06:58PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > > Am I correct in thinking that double_plus is misnamed and should really > > > be called "relative_size" or something? Felix: Do you remember the > > >

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-14 Thread Jörg F. Wittenberger
Am 14.10.2015 um 09:43 schrieb Peter Bex: > (looks like you accidentally hit reply instead of reply all/reply to list) > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:06:58PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: >>> Am I correct in thinking that double_plus is misnamed and should really >>> be called

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-14 Thread Peter Bex
(looks like you accidentally hit reply instead of reply all/reply to list) On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:06:58PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote: > > Am I correct in thinking that double_plus is misnamed and should really > > be called "relative_size" or something? Felix: Do you remember

[Chicken-hackers] Heap size calculation in rereclaim2

2015-10-13 Thread Peter Bex
Hi hackers, This morning on IRC we were discussing the random breakage on Salmonella, and Evan mentioned that he noticed that the crashes he observed were all at the start of a program. This made me think that perhaps the problem is in how literal decoding is happening and allocated into the