Moritz Heidkamp writes:
> Yeah, that's tricky. I will try to come up with a patch to make the
> version argument of install-extension and install-program optional. This
> should be backwards compatible unless I'm missing something!
OK, having thought about it some more this doesn't work, of cours
Mario Domenech Goulart writes:
>> thanks for that, this will definitely help to make maintenance less of a
>> pain in the meantime unless one forgets to do the salmonella dance :-)
>> It would be better if we wouldn't have to worry about these problems to
>> begin with, though, or would you disagr
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:04:53 +0100 Moritz Heidkamp
wrote:
> Mario Domenech Goulart writes:
>> I don't know exactly how to simplify this situation, so I'll comment on
>> how detect those errors.
>>
>> [... lots of useful advice ...]
>
> thanks for that, this will definitely help to make maintena
Hi Mario,
Mario Domenech Goulart writes:
> I don't know exactly how to simplify this situation, so I'll comment on
> how detect those errors.
>
> [... lots of useful advice ...]
thanks for that, this will definitely help to make maintenance less of a
pain in the meantime unless one forgets to do
Hi der gute Moritz,
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:51:22 +0100 Moritz Heidkamp
wrote:
> I just had the following problem (again): I tagged a new version of the
> lowdown egg (0.0.6). While doing so I realized that the previous tag
> (0.0.5) still installed itself as 0.0.4 via the install-extension
> in
Fellow Chickeneers,
I just had the following problem (again): I tagged a new version of the
lowdown egg (0.0.6). While doing so I realized that the previous tag
(0.0.5) still installed itself as 0.0.4 via the install-extension
invocation in its .setup file. This lead me to think over the whole
sit
