Hi all,
maybe that's not a wishlist entry, but just me missing somthing?
When adding type declarations to some source, which has grown
for over a decade, I ran into this situation:
There's are widespread use cases of some types, which are actually
implemented as vectors, pairs or lists with a
Hi,
have you tried define-type:
syntax(define-type NAME TYPE)/syntax
Defines a type-abbreviation {{NAME}} that can be used in place of
{{TYPE}}. Type-abbreviations defined inside a module are not visible
outside of that module.
___
Chicken-hackers
