If the mini-srfi-1 stuff is only (to be) required in operator position
it could be given as syntax.
Right, depending on how much code is generated. Operators that don't
include a loop are likely to be inlined by the compiler, anyway, who
takes care of avoiding the duplication of values in
Just a remark.
If the mini-srfi-1 stuff is only (to be) required in operator position
it could be given as syntax.
Am 15.02.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Felix Winkelmann:
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds the
procedures that are currently needed. It is included by several
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds the
procedures that are currently needed. It is included by several
units, mostly compiler units.
Rather than including the file, would it be better to construct
mini-srfi-1 as another chicken.compiler library unit and link it with
On 2015-02-01 21:56, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
I pushed a branch (drop-srfi-1) for extracting srfi-1 from
chicken-core. I thought it might be easier to handle than a patch
because I'm not sure if everybody agrees on the way it's been
implemented, and some things may change.
Fantastic! I'm very
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
Right, that was the intention. The definitions in mini-srfi-1.scm are not
exposed currently.
Oh, if they don't show through to user code in csi, then no problem.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org
Nobody expects the RESTifarian
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds the
procedures that are currently needed. It is included by several
units, mostly compiler units.
This sounds like the Right Thing. We'll need some documentation on
what mini-srfi-1 supports; in
Hello!
I pushed a branch (drop-srfi-1) for extracting srfi-1 from
chicken-core. I thought it might be easier to handle than a patch
because I'm not sure if everybody agrees on the way it's been
implemented, and some things may change.
Here a few notes:
- There is an include file
From: Peter Bex pe...@more-magic.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] extracting srfi-1 from chicken 5
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:27:38 +0100
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 05:23:11PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 05:23:11PM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
- There is an include file (mini-srfi-1.scm) that holds the
procedures that are currently needed. It is included by several
units, mostly compiler units.
This sounds like the Right Thing. We'll
