On 9/4/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stable are those versions that work with my software :-) You do
make valid points in your email to Peter, and if you don't feel like
declaring official stable releases and bothering with binary packages,
that's fine with me. But like you say,
On 9/4/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that's not what's happening. The trunk, which is the best
and most stable, does not build at least in linux-amd64 and mingw-x86.
Quite right, I should have followed my own policy and started a branch first.
But it is too late now, and
On 9/5/07, Matthew Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the classic kernel model that some end users (including me) would
probably appreciate (just restating the obvious here for the record):
This looks quite good. Perhaps a release branch, to which fixes are
regularly merged from the
Hallo,
On 9/3/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That distinction always felt arbitrary to me. Can you define what a
suitable version
for a release is? Version X or version X + 1 with bug Y fixed?
Chicken doesn't have any unstable versions. The HEAD is always
(ok, should always)
** This is the opinion of an enthusiastic *end user* of chicken. **
Keeping up with change consumes time and energy on many levels. I would prefer
to see periodic releases but I do understand that for those working on the
bleeding edge maintaining releases is an annoying distraction.
Here is
On 9/1/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:28:37PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
The chicken version has been bumped to 2.701, now. There will be
no more official releases from now on, just continuously created
snapshots.
IMHO this is not a good idea. Other
Hi Felix and folks,
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:28:37 +0200 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The chicken version has been bumped to 2.701, now. There will be
no more official releases from now on, just continuously created
snapshots. Mario's automated snapshot builds can be considered
what platforms and do we have testsuites available? i'm willing to help write
a testsuite to make this job feasible.
-elf
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 9/2/07, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to agree that no official releases is a Bad Thing, unless it's a
temporary
On Sep 2, 2007, at 12:46 AM, Elf wrote:
what platforms and do we have testsuites available?
See chicken-eggs/chicken/trunk/tests. Not a testsuite like those
found in many eggs but what I run (along w/ the benchmarks) as a
build checkout.
i'm willing to help write
a testsuite to
On 9/2/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So who is going to step in and volunteer to perform, or procure,
enough cross-platform testing to be worthy of the name release
manager?
I don't have the time for that, but I do have access to Solaris/SPARC
systems, and would help to set up a
I tend to agree that no official releases is a Bad Thing, unless it's a
temporary change.
-elf
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Peter Bex wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 07:28:37PM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
The chicken version has been bumped to 2.701, now. There will be
no more official releases
On 9/2/07, Elf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to agree that no official releases is a Bad Thing, unless it's a
temporary change.
So who is going to step in and volunteer to perform, or procure,
enough cross-platform testing to be worthy of the name release
manager?
12 matches
Mail list logo
