> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Here's another trivial one in the same vein.
>
> And another one (I think this is the last one).
>
Pushed.
felix
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Here's another trivial one in the same vein.
And another one (I think this is the last one).
Cheers,
Peter
From b0157017c6060a57d6b2fc87752446bc518cee57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Bex
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 09:22:40 +0200
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 03:25:51PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
> > improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
> > recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
> > face.
>
>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 03:25:51PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
> improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
> recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
> face.
Here's another
Peter Bex writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
> improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
> recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
> face.
>
Thanks, pushed.
Hi all,
Here's a simple patch. Found while reviewing Megane's patch for
improving line number reporting in [ei]r-macro-transformer; this
recompiled expand.scm which rubbed those compiler warnings in my
face.
I think having these redundant predicate checks in the expander was
a temporary measure
