On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 12:09:55PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> Also, we forgot to look at Salmonella or we'd noticed:
> http://salmonella-linux-x86-64.call-cc.org/master/gcc/linux/x86-64/2022/10/24/yesterday-diff/
So above, that's "-151" for succesfull installation, i.e. we broke 151
eggs (either
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 05:23:24PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> > As reported by Kon, our previous "fix" for shell argument quoting
> > exposed another bug, this is an attempt to improve on that.
>
> Thanks, pushed.
>
> Also, we forgot to look at Salmonella or we'd noticed:
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 05:23:24PM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> As reported by Kon, our previous "fix" for shell argument quoting
> exposed another bug, this is an attempt to improve on that.
Thanks, pushed.
Also, we forgot to look at Salmonella or we'd noticed:
As reported by Kon, our previous "fix" for shell argument quoting
exposed another bug, this is an attempt to improve on that.
felix
From b4b2561f4bdd13ce92fee6a877846f9ad521bde4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:21:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix double-quoting bug in
