Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with internal procedures.

2011-09-26 Thread Felix
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with internal procedures. Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:45:23 +0200 The attached patch should be a little bit faster than the old version since we don't do redundant type checks

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with internal procedures.

2011-09-26 Thread Christian Kellermann
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110926 08:45]: From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with internal procedures. Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:45:23 +0200 The attached patch should be a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with internal procedures.

2011-09-26 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [110926 10:01]: Ignore this. I suck. Let me fetch some coffee and redo it properly. That should work better. -- Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Ports checking

2011-09-26 Thread Felix
I've noticed that at least in extras.scm almost none of the procedures check whether they get the *right* port, i.e. whether read routines get input-port and write procedures get output-ports. True. These ought to get extended. There are also more things that should be done:

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] simplify typevar instantiation handling in scrutinizer

2011-09-26 Thread Christian Kellermann
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110926 13:28]: From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org Subject: [PATCH] simplify typevar instantiation handling in scrutinizer Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:23:02 +0200 (CEST) Attached is a patch that simplifies the use