From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with
internal procedures.
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:45:23 +0200
The attached patch should be a little bit faster than the old version
since we don't do redundant type checks
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110926 08:45]:
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] replace write-line calls to display with
internal procedures.
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:45:23 +0200
The attached patch should be a
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [110926 10:01]:
Ignore this. I suck.
Let me fetch some coffee and redo it properly.
That should work better.
--
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will
gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let
I've noticed that at least in extras.scm almost none of the procedures
check whether they get the *right* port, i.e. whether read routines
get input-port and write procedures get output-ports.
True. These ought to get extended. There are also more things that
should be done:
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110926 13:28]:
From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Subject: [PATCH] simplify typevar instantiation handling in scrutinizer
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:23:02 +0200 (CEST)
Attached is a patch that simplifies the use