> > As Peter remarks, this code is too hairy. I added a comment trying
> > to explain the reason for this.
>
> Thanks for adding a bit of explanation. Are the lists really that long
> though? I'd expect this syntax to be used only in user-typed literals,
> not in data to be read in.
I was
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 08:06:01AM +0200, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Attached a patch to fix some problems with the newly introduced
> extension to SRFI-4 vector read syntax. "Siiky" pointed out a bogus
> empty string comparison and further testing showed that empty strings
>
