Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Peter Danenberg
Mario should be able to give you commit access to this egg if you would like. That would be great; at least one of the tests appears to depend on srfi-40, for which I thought streams was an apt replacement (it's indexed by srfi-41). Apparently, though, I may not be able to avoid porting

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:32:05 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: Mario should be able to give you commit access to this egg if you would like. It's done. Thanks Peter and Jim. Best wishes. Mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Peter Danenberg
Quoth Mario Domenech Goulart on Prickle-Prickle, the 14th of Chaos: It's done. Thanks, again, Mario for so promptly taking care of it. ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Peter Danenberg p...@roxygen.org wrote: It always irritated me, by the way, that srfi-41 was called streams (just like srfi-78 was call check); is it possible to alias it somehow to srfi-41? Oh, I did not know of this naming bifurcation. That is confusing and