The attached patch... well, you know what it does. If nobody wants to
sign off this trivial change, I'll just commit it myself.
cheers,
felix
From 1a7ef59172f5e4675679d1aaa79831ca8e7238c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [111027 09:18]:
The attached patch... well, you know what it does. If nobody wants to
sign off this trivial change, I'll just commit it myself.
Ah I must have missed it. Please go ahead.
--
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)?
The attached patch adds a batch file for running most of the
tests also in a mingw Windows environment (without msys).
cheers,
felix
From 2f92b11d4f027169b76f6282f4b902562e92baaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:36:35 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [111027 09:43]:
The attached patch adds a batch file for running most of the
tests also in a mingw Windows environment (without msys).
Ok, by me but I cannot test it. So go ahead if this works for you.
(Maybe someone else can).
--
The attached patch adds debugging-output for optimizations
done by the compiler to the generated C file, which may be
helpful when analyzing or debugging the compiler.
cheers,
felix
From ad0c0fa4fcf2997aa1eda1eec54a2a14666c0fd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: felix
The attached patch adds an optimization (originally suggested by
chairman shinn), which turns groups of local procedures into dispatch
loop. This can give good performance improvements in tight code that
performs no (or few) CPS calls. Currently it is not enabled by
default, but will probably
This patch adds some cleanups and enhancements to the interrupt and
signal-handling facilities, as posted recently. Thanks to Joerg
Wittenberger and Alan Post for their valuable suggestions, which have
been incorporated in this change. I have tested it on Linux and the
core system appears to
On Oct 27 2011, Felix wrote:
This patch adds some cleanups and enhancements to the interrupt and
signal-handling facilities, as posted recently.
I found the patch would rename never_mind_edsgar into i_like_spaghetti.
Thus the reference in this message would need a change now.
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Overhaul interrupt handling
Date: 27 Oct 2011 14:36:08 +0200
On Oct 27 2011, Felix wrote:
This patch adds some cleanups and enhancements to the interrupt and
signal-handling facilities, as posted
On Oct 27 2011, Felix wrote:
I found the patch would rename never_mind_edsgar into
i_like_spaghetti.
Yeah, it's a great idea, isn't it? I'm particularly proud
of this one.
Sure it is! My Congratulations.
BTW: recently I started to wonder: it's a nice feature that chicken
comes with only
I'm surprised:
yesterday I posted this trivial diff
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-10/msg00119.html
after I found that this would double the speed of the chicken compiler.
(the chicken compiler run itself, not the whole build process
with gcc et al (since not
11 matches
Mail list logo
