Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:09:25PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Attached patch fixes ticket #870. Shouldn't there be regression tests for this? I know mario created a repo with tests for srfi-13 and srfi-1. Personally I think this really belongs in core, so why not do that now? Cheers, Peter --

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] catch exceptions in finalizers, remove dynamic resizing of finalizer vector

2012-06-20 Thread Christian Kellermann
* John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org [120619 20:48]: Felix scripsit: ASCII-art would be acceptable too, I miss the old banners. Oh, man - you too? Ah, those were the days ... I always thought of the old Chicken banner as the Scheme version of the CLISP banner: Does anyone still have

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] catch exceptions in finalizers, remove dynamic resizing of finalizer vector

2012-06-20 Thread Christian Kellermann
Hi Felix! * felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120619 11:38]: The attached patch adds exception handling around the invocation of finalizers, which are shown as warnings (unless warnings are disabled) but do not otherwise trigger errors (similar to the way errors in

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:11:23 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:09:25PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Attached patch fixes ticket #870. Shouldn't there be regression tests for this? I know mario created a repo with tests for srfi-13 and srfi-1.

[Chicken-hackers] Chicken UK 2012 is looming!

2012-06-20 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It's only a few months away now, so high time I started finalising the plans for this :-) Please take a moment to update your entry in the table if you think you might be coming. And especially if you think you aren't coming but you're in the table!

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:11:23 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:09:25PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Attached patch fixes ticket #870. Shouldn't there be regression tests for this? I know mario created a repo with tests for srfi-13 and srfi-1. Personally I

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:07:52 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:07:32AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Regardless of the [in]existence of in-core tests for SRFI-13, I think the patch is ok and actually improves things by fixing some bugs. I'd like to

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix trivial typo in runtime.c

2012-06-20 Thread Peter Bex
Hi all, Here's a small patch to fix a typo I caught while looking over the GC code. It doesn't fix the finalizer bugs we found, since the heap_free function currently simply ignores its second argument. Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- The process of preparing programs for a digital