As mentioned in #917, that conditional is in there deliberately
because the clang build was observed to break with it in. Felix added
it originally when he was building with an ancient clang. When I was
getting clang working again, I left it alone because I still saw breakage
(or at least it was
The attached patch fixes a bug reported by Christian. The type-validation
of "deprecated" type-specifiers returned an incorrect value. Also, a small
bug in the type-database is fixed.
This should go into 4.8.0, I think.
>From 74d8892ad71dd85ad58df549fc23f61cd2e147ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:30:03 +0200 Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:18:38PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>>
>> Christian Lask reported on #chicken that make check fails when Chicken
>> is built with clang (see #917).
>>
>> The attached patch seems to fix that problem (tested
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:18:38PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian Lask reported on #chicken that make check fails when Chicken
> is built with clang (see #917).
>
> The attached patch seems to fix that problem (tested with clang 3.0).
I wonder if this will work with old
Thanks everyone who was involved! I'm running the latest RC and it seems
great, no issues so far. I'm especially glad since it fixed a segfault and
now my customers are happier :-)
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:05:36PM +0200, Felix wrote:
> >
> >
