On 2020-05-07 16:43, Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > Which of the following options would you prefer? > > 1. Patching scsh-process to pass the correct file mask when using `file-open`. > 2. Patching posixunix.scm to calculate a better default.
Option 2 seems preferable to me; it should at least match `open-output-file' if not the umask, but either change will be backwards-incompatible so anything we do will probably nee a CR. But in the meantime, why not option 1 as well? It wouldn't hurt to be explicit in scsh-process, and given that it is intended to be a shell-like tool I would expect the umask to kick in regardless of what core does. Evan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
