Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com writes:
This patch trivally silences the errors (also see #917).
Yup, that fixes the issue and my 'make check' now runs to completion.
I'm on 10.8.1 with just the Command Line tools installed (no Xcode).
I think you should include this patch in the release.
FYI,
I also have NetBSD systems. I decided to check 4.8.0rc3 and gcc builds
and completes 'make check'. Unfortunately, clang doesn't. It builds
and installs fine, but 'make check' gives me this:
clang version 3.0 (tags/RELEASE_30/final)
Target: x86_64--netbsd
Thread model: posix
Derrell Piper d...@electric-loft.org writes:
I'm happy to report that clang 3.1 fixed this. 'make check's clean now.
So you can add NetBSD 6.0_RC1 gcc and clang to the 'works' list. Ship it.
Derrell
FYI,
I also have NetBSD systems. I decided to check 4.8.0rc3 and gcc builds
Hi,
The 4.8.0rc3 tarball built with clang is failing 'make check' on OS X
using the command_line_tools_for_xcode_os_x_mountain_lion_aug_2012.dmg
tools (from the Apple Developer Downloads section). gcc's fine and
clang builds okay, it's only the 'make check' that's failing.
build commands used:
Anyone else trying to build trunk on Lion? Or is this the problem Felix
alluded to a while back?
make C_COMPILER=gcc-4.2 PLATFORM=macosx PREFIX=/usr/local ARCH=x86-64
.
.
.
gcc-4.2 -m64 -L. chicken-profile.o -o chicken-profile -lchicken -lm
chicken csc.scm -optimize-level 2
Ah, yes, thanks!
On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:04:19PM -0700, Derrell Piper wrote:
Anyone else trying to build trunk on Lion? Or is this the problem Felix
alluded to a while back?
make C_COMPILER=gcc-4.2 PLATFORM=macosx PREFIX=/usr/local ARCH
PS,
I'm happy to assign this to myself and commit a fix to the trunk if
that's acceptable. Not sure what the commit protocol is around here...
The actual fix I'd submit is this (I moved the three places that swap
out the library lists to a single function):
diff --git a/csc.scm b/csc.scm
index
Greetings,
I originally posted a query on chicken-users but I think this is probably
better discussed here.
Seeing that 4.3.0 is out without ,step, may I ask what motivated the removal of
single-stepping? Looking at the diffs, I see it was tied to APPLYHOOK and
that's gone too, so I assume
