Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-24 Thread Alex Queiroz
Hallo, On Nov 23, 2007 6:27 PM, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Preaching to the choir I'm sure but other SCM systems don't have this problem (if I understand the issue correctly). My experience is limitied to bitkeeper and monotone, I have evaluated darcs, mecurial, git and a couple

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-23 Thread Matthew Welland
On Friday 23 November 2007 06:03:15 am Peter Bex wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 12:44:16PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: On Nov 23, 2007 6:19 AM, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fair enough. Since the tarballs don't come with eggs (there is only one egg repository), in effect you

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-22 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John and folks, On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:04:41 -0500 John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit: Stable releases = http://chicken.wiki.br/releases These may be stable in the sense that the bits in them, exept for the most recent instance, don't change: but they