Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. What should I use instead? It has been removed on Oct 4th

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous build? In my version there is no trace of

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:11]: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:13]: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130304 15:11]: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h .

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news item. the ##sys# API is not even documented so I don't think it needs

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote: Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd consider it worth a news

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
On Mar 4 2013, Peter Bex wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote: Hi Jörg, Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
On Mar 4 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? Are you mixing up files? Or using a chicken.h from a previous

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ##sys#double-number gone; intetional?

2013-03-04 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Thanks a lot, this one seems to do the job. On Mar 4 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net [130304 14:57]: I found that ##sys#double-number is gone from library.scm . Still it's there in chicken.h . Mistake or intended? At least I'd