* Mario Domenech Goulart [120531 14:40]:
> I have reverted this patch, since the real cause was a bug in the
> specializer, as Felix pointed out. The patch provided by Felix
> (c31c6ecf7c6ffcde49707184d49c6303792649a4) fixes it.
I was going to suggest this. We don't need yet another typecheck i
On Thu, 24 May 2012 16:00:19 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:59:07 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:43:02 +0200 Christian Kellermann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> * Mario Domenech Goulart [120524 19:37]:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:59:07 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:43:02 +0200 Christian Kellermann
> wrote:
>
>> * Mario Domenech Goulart [120524 19:37]:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian Kellermann
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The diff below fixes the bug
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:43:02 +0200 Christian Kellermann
wrote:
> * Mario Domenech Goulart [120524 19:37]:
>>
>> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian Kellermann
>> wrote:
>>
>> > The diff below fixes the bug methinks.
>>
>> Thanks for looking into it.
>>
>> Wouldn't be better, since it
* Mario Domenech Goulart [120524 19:37]:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian Kellermann
> wrote:
>
> > The diff below fixes the bug methinks.
>
> Thanks for looking into it.
>
> Wouldn't be better, since it doesn't traverse the list twice?
Hm, yeah. I wanted to sepa
Hi Christian,
On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian Kellermann
wrote:
> The diff below fixes the bug methinks.
Thanks for looking into it.
Wouldn't
diff --git a/files.scm b/files.scm
index 3fae8f5..5c00875 100644
--- a/files.scm
+++ b/files.scm
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ EOF
(if (null
Hi!
The diff below fixes the bug methinks.
Cheers,
Christian
--
9 out of 10 voices in my head say, that I am crazy,
one is humming.
>From 5d8663e7832982f9fb6ac7c9642a9c9e3085e433 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christian Kellermann
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:12:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Check al
