* Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [140317 21:38]:
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes the problem from subject, as described here:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2014-03/msg00088.html
It also cleans up the code a little bit by re-using well-named C
functions instead of
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes the problem from subject, as described here:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2014-03/msg00088.html
It also cleans up the code a little bit by re-using well-named C
functions instead of repeating the same inline and C preprocessor-heavy
checks
On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:38 PM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi all,
The attached patch fixes the problem from subject, as described here:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2014-03/msg00088.html
It also cleans up the code a little bit by re-using well-named C
