Am 06.11.2013 21:21, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:50:05PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
This second parameter is always vars, which in turn is the third
parameter of make-mode-choice below.
Are you sure it isn't already #unspecified where make-mode-choice is
invoked?
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:09:24AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
And sure one level up there was the broken letrec, which when written as
letrec* brings everything back to working order.
Ah, that's good to hear.
Sorry for the noise again.
(Now I've got a different problem… rscheme is
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
(Now I've got a different problem… rscheme is still supposed to run
this code. But I'm not inclined to add letrec* support to rscheme.
:-/ )
You don't need to. Letrec* was born from the realization that many R5RS
Schemes that were claiming to implement letrec
Thanks John,
Am 07.11.2013 17:40, schrieb John Cowan:
So for RScheme purposes, just write a trivial syntax-rules macro:
(define-syntax letrec*
(syntax-rules ()
((letrec* . x) (letrec . x
(This requires loading the RScheme syntax-rules support.)
The main point for me is in your
Hi,
despite the fact that salmonella currently seems to be happy with the
situation, let me add my €0,02.
Sometimes the solution is not more code but less.
Chicken's interrupt handling was broken for quite a long time. There is
by now still a problem lurking and waiting to be triggered:
Am 06.11.2013 15:29, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
My solution at that time was to coalesce signals by type and handle all
reasons of a particular signal in a single signal handler (anyway) since
- as you're pointing out - this must be
Am 06.11.2013 19:11, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Now I cam confused.
True, there are 256 possible signal handlers in ##sys#signal-vector
How could those be addressed/used at all?
The timer interrupt signal has value 255. I'm sure
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:20:41 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
It's somehow related to code, which uses Petrofsky extraction
(replacing some hon-hygienic macros I've been using before). This
used to compile perfectly for several month. Now it
Am 06.11.2013 19:33, schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:20:41 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger
joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net wrote:
It's somehow related to code, which uses Petrofsky extraction
(replacing some hon-hygienic macros I've been using before). This
used
Am 06.11.2013 19:35, schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am 06.11.2013 19:33, schrieb Mario Domenech Goulart:
I'd bet it is a consequence of the introduction of `letrec*'. The
behavior of `letrec' has been fixed with the introduction of `letrec*'
(see
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:20:41PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Now I ran a full recompile. To the effect that some macro expansion has
been changed to the worse.
It's somehow related to code, which uses Petrofsky extraction (replacing
some hon-hygienic macros I've been using
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:37:11PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I'm afraid it's something within the macro expander itself... which
means that it might effect more code than just the one here.
To that end: my code uses this syntax eventually in the context of a
lambda. Maybe that's
Am 06.11.2013 19:35, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:20:41PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Now I ran a full recompile. To the effect that some macro expansion has
been changed to the worse.
It's somehow related to code, which uses Petrofsky extraction (replacing
some
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
At the moment this is my favorite, where I'd bet things break:
(define-syntax define-transformer
(syntax-rules ()
((_ transformer errloc body)
(begin
;; (: name :render-renderer:)
(define
Am 06.11.2013 19:39, schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am 06.11.2013 19:35, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 07:20:41PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Now I ran a full recompile. To the effect that some macro expansion
has
been changed to the worse.
It's somehow related to code,
Am 06.11.2013 20:27, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:18:20PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Things seem to be much worse than expected.
Without going into all the nasty details, this is roughly where the
problem is:
The parameter named 'static-variables' here turned out to
Am 06.11.2013 20:33, schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
Am 06.11.2013 20:27, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:18:20PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote: NAH; I don't expect you to dig into it.
Actually it looks as if my assessment was wrong anyway: in the
meantime I traced the
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
At least we're now within the scope of a letrec ;-)
I must say that's a huge relief :)
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Am 06.11.2013 20:38, schrieb Peter Bex:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:34:38PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
At least we're now within the scope of a letrec ;-)
I must say that's a huge relief :)
I'm not that sure about the relief. For the fun of it (no more, except
that somebody is
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:52:16 +0100 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:09:54PM +, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:09:06 +0100 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
The patch's commit message explains it all :) I hope it's clear enough
to
Hi all,
The patch's commit message explains it all :) I hope it's clear enough
to understand what's going on in the patch. If not, feel free to ask
me for clarification. I hope I can provide it :/
I've added a few comments to the code again to explain what's happening,
as that was REALLY
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:09:06 +0100 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
The patch's commit message explains it all :) I hope it's clear enough
to understand what's going on in the patch. If not, feel free to ask
me for clarification. I hope I can provide it :/
I've added a few comments to
22 matches
Mail list logo
