From: Florian Zumbiehl fl...@florz.de
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] tcp: disable interrupts
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:50:46 +0100
Hi,
On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
If you cannot be sufficiently sure
that your approach is correct to be willing
On Mar 17 2013, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
Somehow, this feels to me like you are applying test driven development
techniques to concurrency correctness. Are you sure that your reasoning is
correct and reliable and future-proof? Are the assumptions you make about
the compiler true now for sure and
On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
If you cannot be sufficiently sure
that your approach is correct to be willing to build a full fix on it
without testing first, I would consider that a sign that the approach is
too fragile to rely on, at least without a good reason.
I
Add (declare (disable-interrupts)) to tcp so that errno doesn't get changed at
inappropriate points during execution.
---
I don't really have a clue whether this is the correct way to do it, but
the code that was breaking before is not breaking anymore with this patch
applied ...
tcp.scm |1
From: Florian Zumbiehl fl...@florz.de
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH 1/2] tcp: disable interrupts
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:56:41 +0100
Add (declare (disable-interrupts)) to tcp so that errno doesn't get changed at
inappropriate points during execution.
---
I don't really have a clue
